Liberty Pundits Blog

Gaza like Warsaw? How insulting

Posted by Clyde Middleton on Jun 2 2009 Filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Following the recent 22-day conflict between Israel and Hamas, anti-Israel proponents – in politics (see YouTube below), the UN, Hamas, trade unions, academia, and in the media – have drawn spurious comparisons of the situation of Palestinians in Gaza to that of Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto during World War II.

Politics:

The reason the Warsaw Ghetto analogy is used is to trump up libelous claims that Jews who were once the victims of the Nazis during the Holocaust are now the victimizers carrying out the genocide of Palestinians. Interestingly, note that comparisons of Israeli policy and actions to Nazism fit the European Union’s and U.S. State Department’s working definition of anti-Semitism.

Vancouver-based “alternative” magazine Adbusters, which bills itself as an “anti-consumerist” publication, recently made this comparison in its May/June edition. A prominent 6-page report (click here to view it in PDF format) by Saeed David Mohammed, mockingly titled “Never Again,” featured nine large photographs juxtaposing gruesome images of the Warsaw Ghetto with images of Gaza in a feeble attempt to demonstrate similarities.

The grotesque and misleading photo montage, along with the article, lacked the necessary context required. For example, one photograph contrasted dead members of the Jewish resistance executed by the SS in the Warsaw Ghetto with unknown Palestinian prisoners wounded after an Israeli airstrike in Gaza in late December. Other photos showed dead bodies outside of a Hamas “police headquarters” compared to bodies of Jewish policemen executed in the Ghetto uprising.

According to writer Mohammed:

Comparing any event with the actions of Nazi Germany during World War II should never be done lightly. When events lend themselves to such comparisons, however, it can almost certainly be said that something is very wrong. Though the stated goal of Israel has never been the complete destruction of the Palestinian people, the tactics and policies supported by the state of Israel paint an extremely grim picture.

Contrary to Mohammed’s pernicious thesis, 1943 Warsaw is nothing like 2009 Gaza for the following reasons:

1) Ha’aretz’s Bradley Burston notes that this comparison:

… denies and diminishes and exploits the Holocaust, does disrespect to Holocaust victims and survivors alike, alleviates European guilt over complicity with the Nazis, alleviates American guilt over inaction in the face of the annihilation machine, misrepresents both the cruel reality of the Gaza Strip and the cruel reality of the ghetto, dismisses the humanity and the vulnerability of the million Israeli Jews and Arabs within rocket range, and ignores completely the role of Hamas, the Islamic Jihad, the Popular Resistance Committees, and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, in having sent thousands and thousands and thousands of rockets and mortars into Israel.

2) As Eamonn McDonagh expounds on the Z-Word blog:

The Jews in the Ghetto didn’t have their very own international aid organization to provide for their basic needs and there was no Jewish political entity down the road which enjoyed a limited measure of peace and prosperity despite being occupied by Germany. No Jewish organization had ever sworn to destroy Germany and turn it into a Jewish state. No Jewish organization had ever fired thousands of rockets at Germany towns and cities. No Jewish organization had sent suicide bombers into Germany and slaughtered hundreds of Germans while they went about their lawful business.

3) According to Middle East historian Mark LeVine on the Al Jazeera website:

Gaza is not the Warsaw Ghetto. Even after the latest war, Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank remain rooted to the soil, not buried beneath it.

The Warsaw Ghetto was used by the Nazis to confine Jews into the smallest possible space, eventually in preparation for their ultimate extermination – which became official Nazi policy within a year of the ghetto’s creation. Out of an initial population of over 400,000 Jews, 100,000 had died of disease and starvation by the time the uprising began in 1943. To be comparable, by 2007 over 300,000 Gazans would have to have died from similar causes.

This isn’t the first time Adbusters has been in hot water. In 2004 the magazine was accused of anti-Semitism for featuring an article entitled “Why won’t anyone say they are Jewish?” that identified supporters of the Bush Administration and the Iraq war as Jewish. A list of fifty prominent “neo-conservatives” was presented, half of which featured dots next to names of those who are Jewish.

Adbusters’ and Mohammed’s highly charged Gaza/Warsaw Ghetto comparisons are odious and do not hold up to scrutiny. As Deborah Lipstadt, Professor of Modern Jewish and Holocaust Studies at the Institute for Jewish Studies at Emory University notes, comparing “Jews to Nazis is not only ill-informed, it demonstrates a certain prejudice — anti-Semitism — which will never help resolve the situation. Whatever one thinks of Israeli policy, to describe it as akin to the Nazi policy of murdering all of European Jewry is to engage in anti-Semitism and a form of Holocaust denial.”

This post was adopted from HonestReporting Canada.

Related Posts

  1. Hamas already lost control of reality. Now Gaza?
  2. Gaza War, Round 2?
  3. Pro-Gaza activists learn that Hamas is the problem
  4. Harvard’s cheerleader for Hamas: Sara Roy
  5. Carnage in Palestine and anti-semitism.

Short URL: http://libertypundits.net/?p=4387

  • I understand your point.
  • Clyde
    I agree with some of your points, Harrison. You need to understand my perspective: I am blindly (willingly so) devoted to Israel. I will fight tooth and nail for anything they want. I will never condemn her. I will seek out and destroy (as best as commentary can) anyone that opposes her.

    Does that make me a bad journalist? Well, not if the American MSM is the example. But, alas, I am not a journalist anyway - just another girl on the runway with a blog.
  • Every place the British controlled they screwed up, some for longer than others. The Sykes-Picot Agreement is one such example:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes-Picot_Agreement

    A secret agreement between England and France to divide up parts of the middle east.

    Then you have the other school of thought, the Balfour Declaration "which advocated the existence of a 'national home' for Jews - understood to encompass historic Palestine - while respecting the right of non-Jews in the region."

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/...

    Other messes made by the British include breaking off part of Iraq to form Kuwait, among other things as well as the creation of Jordan. None of these "countries" would have been formed in the way that they were without Western interference.

    More and more Jews were moving in, making the native non-Jews feeling betrayed and crowded. WWII just made it worse. Things just went downhill from there.

    While I'm not saying the Jews don't deserve a land of their own the fact is they kind of carved out land that, at that time, didn't really "belong" to them even though historically they had claim to it. Of course, Arab leaders don't care about the Palestinians but it is a convenient rallying cry to raise money or further their agendas. And while you can't compare that region to Warsaw the fact is, I think, England (and France) did the entire region a major disservice.
  • Clyde
    Israel & Palestine, Obvious Questions No One Asks - Chapter 1

    The 1844 census of Jerusalem found 7120 Jews…5760 Muslims…3390 Christians.

    In 1869, Mark Twain wrote of the emptiness of the land, of traveling all day without seeing a human being on the roads or in the countryside.

    Mark Twain wrote of Arab sloth and filth and flies.

    In the 1880s, Americans forced Indians from their land to resettle Indian land with whites. Many Indians had to be killed.

    In the 1880s, Australians forced Aborigines from their land to resettle Aborigine land with whites. Many Aborigines had to be killed.

    In the 1880s, white New Zealanders forced Maoris from their land to resettle Maori land with whites. Many Maoris had to be killed.

    In the 1880s, European Jews bought idle land in what is now Israel, joining Mizrahi Jews continuously there since Abraham.

    Beginning in 1882, forty Jewish families settled at Rishon L’Tzion. Four hundred Arab families settled around them. Some of the Arab families were Bedouin. Some came from Egypt.

    A British official reported Arabs sought employment, clean drinking water, better health care, and lower infant mortality. The official reported this pattern was repeated across areas where Jews settled.

    In the 1890s, Belgians cut off the hands of Africans who did not gather enough rubber.

    In the 1890s, Arabs flocked to Jewish areas of Palestine for jobs created by Jewish investment and enterprise.

    After WWI, Britain tried to set up a Palestinian governing body of twelve…eight Arabs…two Christians…two Jews. Arabs said two Jews were too many. A cynic might say Arabs knew then two Jews outnumbered eight Arabs.

    In 1917, the British Balfour Agreement promised a national home for Jews in Palestine. The British did not mean it.

    Arabs turned down two-state solutions in 1917, 1937, 1948, and 2000.

    After a Nazi supported Arab revolt in 1936-1939, British-backed Arab religious leader Husseini fled to Germany. Husseini is revered throughout Islam today.

    In 1939, A British White Paper severely restricted Jewish immigration into Palestine.

    After WWII, European Jews sought refuge in what is now Israel. The Arabist British did all they could to keep Jews out of Palestine. Under United Nations mandate, Jews established the State of Israel despite Arab objections and Britain perfidy.

    In the United Nations document authorizing the formation of the state of Israel, an Arab/British/African clause weighted population numbers in favor of Arabs. In 1948, the Arab population was still largely transient. This clause identified any Arab who had been in Palestine for two years as a permanent resident.

    Do we give casual Mexican labor citizenship after two years in the United States?

    In 1948, Arab countries attacked the infant Jewish nation. Jewish citizen soldiers decisively defeated combined professional armies of five Arab nations.

    In 1948, 850,000 Arab residents of Israel fled and/or were expelled. There is evidence Arabs residents were encouraged by Arab invaders to flee to give Arab invaders a freer hand.

    Only Jordan offered refugees citizenship. In all other Muslim countries, Palestinian refugees remain in camps sixty years later…anti-Israeli propaganda pawns.

    In the months following the 1948 war, 850,000 Sephardic/Mizrahi Jews fled or were expelled to Israel from the Arab countries who lost the war. We do not know how many Jews fled to other nations. We do not know how many Jews were killed. Arab nations claim no knowledge of this flight/expulsion.

    Sephardic Jews had been in the Middle East since 1492, Mizrahi Jews since Abraham.

    If Palestinians wanted their own country, Palestinians would call a constitutional convention…write a governing document…declare a nation. There is precedent.

    Since the 1967 War, these Arabs have been called Palestinians. Palestinians are Arab-speakers…not Arabs. Palestinians are probably Turkish Hittites who reached Palestine via Crete and Cyprus. Palestinian origins are muddy.

    Palestinians are the Philistines of the Bible…the Sea People. What is now Gaza was Philistia. Gaza is theirs…unless Gaza belongs to Canaanite peoples
    Philistines displaced…peoples who had been there since time before memory.

    Romans called the province Palestine to insult rebellious Jews. Ottomans kept the name.

    If Palestinians had lived in peace beside Jews in democratic Israel, Palestinians would own Israel. With the differential in birth rates, Palestinians could have taken democratic Israel with the vote.

    The story of modern Israel & Palestine is not what you have been told.

    Palestinian leader Musa Alami said in 1948, “The people are in great need of a myth to fill their consciousness and imagination.”

    The King of Jordan also denied the displacement of Arabs by Jewish settlements. The king said, “The Arabs are as prodigal in selling their land as they are in…weeping [about it].

    The popular history of Palestine is myth.

    Buy the whole book - it's a short primer, less than 50 pages. Let me know if you want a signed copy - I know the guy and will order it directly from him, not through Amazon - cost is $9.95 and you include a return SASE. http://www.amazon.com/Na%C3%AFve-Abroad-Palesti...
  • They are not the same but many Palestinian familes lost homes when Israel re-created itself and they cannot get those properties back. Certainly the Palestinians did not ask to lose their country to another, even if that country existed historically. Blame the British for how that went down (as well as for the creation of Kuwait when it was broken off from Iraq) as well as many other geopolitical problems (India, Pakistan for example).
blog comments powered by Disqus
Visit our store!

Related Posts

Related Posts

  1. Hamas already lost control of reality. Now Gaza?
  2. Gaza War, Round 2?
  3. Pro-Gaza activists learn that Hamas is the problem
  4. Harvard’s cheerleader for Hamas: Sara Roy
  5. Carnage in Palestine and anti-semitism.
Click to subscribe to LP News

blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you
Log in | Designed by Gabfire themes