<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Every Republican Votes No on Obama Pork Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-2/#comment-2270</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>dear bite me, you are clearly unfamiliar with the legislative drag from the clinton years on the economy.  we forgive you for that.  you guys are often led by emotion rather than intellect, and that&#039;s just how you are drawn.  it&#039;s all good.

gee, i look back at the funny bookkeeping of clinton to create a false surplus, the several attacks worldwide against our interests to which clinton was too busy getting BJs from girls his daughter&#039;s age to confront, and i wonder just how anyone can look back fondly.  but i get it, bite me, your analysis is like the surface of the ocean - is it smooth?  wavy?

come to think of it, how very odd that you would use a moniker such as &quot;bite me&quot; and refer to clinton as the glory years.  got an oral fixation, son?  there&#039;s meds for that, you know.

it&#039;s ok.  we still like you.  thanks for playing along!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear bite me, you are clearly unfamiliar with the legislative drag from the clinton years on the economy.  we forgive you for that.  you guys are often led by emotion rather than intellect, and that&#8217;s just how you are drawn.  it&#8217;s all good.</p>
<p>gee, i look back at the funny bookkeeping of clinton to create a false surplus, the several attacks worldwide against our interests to which clinton was too busy getting BJs from girls his daughter&#8217;s age to confront, and i wonder just how anyone can look back fondly.  but i get it, bite me, your analysis is like the surface of the ocean &#8211; is it smooth?  wavy?</p>
<p>come to think of it, how very odd that you would use a moniker such as &#8220;bite me&#8221; and refer to clinton as the glory years.  got an oral fixation, son?  there&#8217;s meds for that, you know.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s ok.  we still like you.  thanks for playing along!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-2/#comment-27598</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27598</guid>
		<description>dear bite me, you are clearly unfamiliar with the legislative drag from the clinton years on the economy.  we forgive you for that.  you guys are often led by emotion rather than intellect, and that&#039;s just how you are drawn.  it&#039;s all good.

gee, i look back at the funny bookkeeping of clinton to create a false surplus, the several attacks worldwide against our interests to which clinton was too busy getting BJs from girls his daughter&#039;s age to confront, and i wonder just how anyone can look back fondly.  but i get it, bite me, your analysis is like the surface of the ocean - is it smooth?  wavy?

come to think of it, how very odd that you would use a moniker such as &quot;bite me&quot; and refer to clinton as the glory years.  got an oral fixation, son?  there&#039;s meds for that, you know.

it&#039;s ok.  we still like you.  thanks for playing along!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear bite me, you are clearly unfamiliar with the legislative drag from the clinton years on the economy.  we forgive you for that.  you guys are often led by emotion rather than intellect, and that&#8217;s just how you are drawn.  it&#8217;s all good.</p>
<p>gee, i look back at the funny bookkeeping of clinton to create a false surplus, the several attacks worldwide against our interests to which clinton was too busy getting BJs from girls his daughter&#8217;s age to confront, and i wonder just how anyone can look back fondly.  but i get it, bite me, your analysis is like the surface of the ocean &#8211; is it smooth?  wavy?</p>
<p>come to think of it, how very odd that you would use a moniker such as &#8220;bite me&#8221; and refer to clinton as the glory years.  got an oral fixation, son?  there&#8217;s meds for that, you know.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s ok.  we still like you.  thanks for playing along!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bite me</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>bite me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>We dems will pull the economy out of mess repubs left for us to clean up, as usual. You keyboard commandos can bitch, whine, moan and piss your pants like you did for the eight great years of Clinton.

...jus&#039; curious, what did you tards think of the $713 billion republican alternative bill?

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/...lus/index.html

..and Charlie Crist on TV just now supporting Obama&#039;s plan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We dems will pull the economy out of mess repubs left for us to clean up, as usual. You keyboard commandos can bitch, whine, moan and piss your pants like you did for the eight great years of Clinton.</p>
<p>&#8230;jus&#8217; curious, what did you tards think of the $713 billion republican alternative bill?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/...lus/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/&#8230;lus/index.html</a></p>
<p>..and Charlie Crist on TV just now supporting Obama&#8217;s plan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bite me</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-27597</link>
		<dc:creator>bite me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27597</guid>
		<description>We dems will pull the economy out of mess repubs left for us to clean up, as usual. You keyboard commandos can bitch, whine, moan and piss your pants like you did for the eight great years of Clinton.

...jus&#039; curious, what did you tards think of the $713 billion republican alternative bill?

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/...lus/index.html

..and Charlie Crist on TV just now supporting Obama&#039;s plan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We dems will pull the economy out of mess repubs left for us to clean up, as usual. You keyboard commandos can bitch, whine, moan and piss your pants like you did for the eight great years of Clinton.</p>
<p>&#8230;jus&#8217; curious, what did you tards think of the $713 billion republican alternative bill?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/...lus/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/&#8230;lus/index.html</a></p>
<p>..and Charlie Crist on TV just now supporting Obama&#8217;s plan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkady</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator>arkady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-1764</guid>
		<description>Which bills require the 2/3s majority, I have heard of that, but am not familiar as to what merits a bill to such strict requirements. 

But yeah, due to bill death I understand that cloture may be a safety move first.  Makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which bills require the 2/3s majority, I have heard of that, but am not familiar as to what merits a bill to such strict requirements. </p>
<p>But yeah, due to bill death I understand that cloture may be a safety move first.  Makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkady</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-27596</link>
		<dc:creator>arkady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27596</guid>
		<description>Which bills require the 2/3s majority, I have heard of that, but am not familiar as to what merits a bill to such strict requirements. 

But yeah, due to bill death I understand that cloture may be a safety move first.  Makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which bills require the 2/3s majority, I have heard of that, but am not familiar as to what merits a bill to such strict requirements. </p>
<p>But yeah, due to bill death I understand that cloture may be a safety move first.  Makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>you are assuming that everyone who votes for cloture would also vote for the bill.  i don&#039;t agree that one follows the other.

i might for cloture reasons other than supporting a bill.  when a bill is voted on - and presume it does not pass - it is dead and needs to reintroduced.  so i may for to bring the vote to the floor because i think i have the backing to kill it.

i agree that many times cloture is invoked because they want the bill to pass - and the filibuster was to delay the vote - but that is always true.

remember as well, some bills need super majorities to pass - 2/3s - which exceed the cloture 60 vote minimum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are assuming that everyone who votes for cloture would also vote for the bill.  i don&#8217;t agree that one follows the other.</p>
<p>i might for cloture reasons other than supporting a bill.  when a bill is voted on &#8211; and presume it does not pass &#8211; it is dead and needs to reintroduced.  so i may for to bring the vote to the floor because i think i have the backing to kill it.</p>
<p>i agree that many times cloture is invoked because they want the bill to pass &#8211; and the filibuster was to delay the vote &#8211; but that is always true.</p>
<p>remember as well, some bills need super majorities to pass &#8211; 2/3s &#8211; which exceed the cloture 60 vote minimum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-27595</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27595</guid>
		<description>you are assuming that everyone who votes for cloture would also vote for the bill.  i don&#039;t agree that one follows the other.

i might for cloture reasons other than supporting a bill.  when a bill is voted on - and presume it does not pass - it is dead and needs to reintroduced.  so i may for to bring the vote to the floor because i think i have the backing to kill it.

i agree that many times cloture is invoked because they want the bill to pass - and the filibuster was to delay the vote - but that is always true.

remember as well, some bills need super majorities to pass - 2/3s - which exceed the cloture 60 vote minimum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are assuming that everyone who votes for cloture would also vote for the bill.  i don&#8217;t agree that one follows the other.</p>
<p>i might for cloture reasons other than supporting a bill.  when a bill is voted on &#8211; and presume it does not pass &#8211; it is dead and needs to reintroduced.  so i may for to bring the vote to the floor because i think i have the backing to kill it.</p>
<p>i agree that many times cloture is invoked because they want the bill to pass &#8211; and the filibuster was to delay the vote &#8211; but that is always true.</p>
<p>remember as well, some bills need super majorities to pass &#8211; 2/3s &#8211; which exceed the cloture 60 vote minimum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkady</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>arkady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>Clyde,

I understand that much, my point was this.  If you have enough votes to break a filibuster, then you have enough votes to get the thing passed by majority.  So it seems pointless, no?  Just vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clyde,</p>
<p>I understand that much, my point was this.  If you have enough votes to break a filibuster, then you have enough votes to get the thing passed by majority.  So it seems pointless, no?  Just vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkady</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-27594</link>
		<dc:creator>arkady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27594</guid>
		<description>Clyde,

I understand that much, my point was this.  If you have enough votes to break a filibuster, then you have enough votes to get the thing passed by majority.  So it seems pointless, no?  Just vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clyde,</p>
<p>I understand that much, my point was this.  If you have enough votes to break a filibuster, then you have enough votes to get the thing passed by majority.  So it seems pointless, no?  Just vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-1713</guid>
		<description>Cloture is to force a vote on an item - to put a time limit to delays like debate.  It is not the actual vote on the bill.

Source - http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/b_three_sections_with_teasers/virtual.htm

Cloture.  The cloture rule–Rule 22–is the only formal procedure that Senate rules provide for breaking a filibuster. A filibuster is an attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter. Under cloture, the Senate may limit consideration of a pending matter to 30 additional hours of debate.

Filibuster.  Using the filibuster to delay debate or block legislation has a long history. The term filibuster, from a Dutch word meaning &quot;pirate,&quot; became popular in the United States during the 1850s when it was applied to efforts to hold the Senate floor in order to prevent action on a bill.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cloture is to force a vote on an item &#8211; to put a time limit to delays like debate.  It is not the actual vote on the bill.</p>
<p>Source &#8211; <a href="http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/b_three_sections_with_teasers/virtual.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/b_three_sections_with_teasers/virtual.htm</a></p>
<p>Cloture.  The cloture rule–Rule 22–is the only formal procedure that Senate rules provide for breaking a filibuster. A filibuster is an attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter. Under cloture, the Senate may limit consideration of a pending matter to 30 additional hours of debate.</p>
<p>Filibuster.  Using the filibuster to delay debate or block legislation has a long history. The term filibuster, from a Dutch word meaning &#8220;pirate,&#8221; became popular in the United States during the 1850s when it was applied to efforts to hold the Senate floor in order to prevent action on a bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-27593</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27593</guid>
		<description>Cloture is to force a vote on an item - to put a time limit to delays like debate.  It is not the actual vote on the bill.

Source - http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/b_three_sections_with_teasers/virtual.htm

Cloture.  The cloture rule–Rule 22–is the only formal procedure that Senate rules provide for breaking a filibuster. A filibuster is an attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter. Under cloture, the Senate may limit consideration of a pending matter to 30 additional hours of debate.

Filibuster.  Using the filibuster to delay debate or block legislation has a long history. The term filibuster, from a Dutch word meaning &quot;pirate,&quot; became popular in the United States during the 1850s when it was applied to efforts to hold the Senate floor in order to prevent action on a bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cloture is to force a vote on an item &#8211; to put a time limit to delays like debate.  It is not the actual vote on the bill.</p>
<p>Source &#8211; <a href="http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/b_three_sections_with_teasers/virtual.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/b_three_sections_with_teasers/virtual.htm</a></p>
<p>Cloture.  The cloture rule–Rule 22–is the only formal procedure that Senate rules provide for breaking a filibuster. A filibuster is an attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter. Under cloture, the Senate may limit consideration of a pending matter to 30 additional hours of debate.</p>
<p>Filibuster.  Using the filibuster to delay debate or block legislation has a long history. The term filibuster, from a Dutch word meaning &#8220;pirate,&#8221; became popular in the United States during the 1850s when it was applied to efforts to hold the Senate floor in order to prevent action on a bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkady</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1712</link>
		<dc:creator>arkady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-1712</guid>
		<description>Rose,

So cloture is to stop filibuster, which they need 60 votes for, which in other words is a winning majority, no?    I am not 100% how it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose,</p>
<p>So cloture is to stop filibuster, which they need 60 votes for, which in other words is a winning majority, no?    I am not 100% how it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkady</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-27592</link>
		<dc:creator>arkady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27592</guid>
		<description>Rose,

So cloture is to stop filibuster, which they need 60 votes for, which in other words is a winning majority, no?    I am not 100% how it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose,</p>
<p>So cloture is to stop filibuster, which they need 60 votes for, which in other words is a winning majority, no?    I am not 100% how it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose2.0</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>I would like to know when &quot;ideological&quot; became a psychosis.  (It makes me think of John Kerry calling GWB &quot;ideological&quot; in the same tone you&#039;d use to say &quot;syphilitic pedophile&quot;.)  The shorter version of that word is &quot;principled&quot;.
Bravo to the ideological, principled House Minority.  This is a new day, guys.  This plan is just shockingly bad and if the Dems had been less arrogant they&#039;d have sucked some weak sisters into it.  Had it been just a less desirable, badly written stimulus, that would be one thing, but this is very clearly not stimulating AT ALL.  So the arrogance of the House Dems and the President, drunk on power, has put us here.  
Johnny Lunchpail will not look back in a year when things get better and say, yep, it was that great Obama stimulus.  If things aren&#039;t better by March 1, the Folks will be pretty darn receptive to hearing what a bad plan this was.  I hope there&#039;s a real outreach process now.
I believe you need the cloture vote to end debate on the Senate side, whether there&#039;s an active filibuster or an &quot;invisible&quot; one.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know when &#8220;ideological&#8221; became a psychosis.  (It makes me think of John Kerry calling GWB &#8220;ideological&#8221; in the same tone you&#8217;d use to say &#8220;syphilitic pedophile&#8221;.)  The shorter version of that word is &#8220;principled&#8221;.<br />
Bravo to the ideological, principled House Minority.  This is a new day, guys.  This plan is just shockingly bad and if the Dems had been less arrogant they&#8217;d have sucked some weak sisters into it.  Had it been just a less desirable, badly written stimulus, that would be one thing, but this is very clearly not stimulating AT ALL.  So the arrogance of the House Dems and the President, drunk on power, has put us here.<br />
Johnny Lunchpail will not look back in a year when things get better and say, yep, it was that great Obama stimulus.  If things aren&#8217;t better by March 1, the Folks will be pretty darn receptive to hearing what a bad plan this was.  I hope there&#8217;s a real outreach process now.<br />
I believe you need the cloture vote to end debate on the Senate side, whether there&#8217;s an active filibuster or an &#8220;invisible&#8221; one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose2.0</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-27591</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27591</guid>
		<description>I would like to know when &quot;ideological&quot; became a psychosis.  (It makes me think of John Kerry calling GWB &quot;ideological&quot; in the same tone you&#039;d use to say &quot;syphilitic pedophile&quot;.)  The shorter version of that word is &quot;principled&quot;.
Bravo to the ideological, principled House Minority.  This is a new day, guys.  This plan is just shockingly bad and if the Dems had been less arrogant they&#039;d have sucked some weak sisters into it.  Had it been just a less desirable, badly written stimulus, that would be one thing, but this is very clearly not stimulating AT ALL.  So the arrogance of the House Dems and the President, drunk on power, has put us here.  
Johnny Lunchpail will not look back in a year when things get better and say, yep, it was that great Obama stimulus.  If things aren&#039;t better by March 1, the Folks will be pretty darn receptive to hearing what a bad plan this was.  I hope there&#039;s a real outreach process now.
I believe you need the cloture vote to end debate on the Senate side, whether there&#039;s an active filibuster or an &quot;invisible&quot; one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know when &#8220;ideological&#8221; became a psychosis.  (It makes me think of John Kerry calling GWB &#8220;ideological&#8221; in the same tone you&#8217;d use to say &#8220;syphilitic pedophile&#8221;.)  The shorter version of that word is &#8220;principled&#8221;.<br />
Bravo to the ideological, principled House Minority.  This is a new day, guys.  This plan is just shockingly bad and if the Dems had been less arrogant they&#8217;d have sucked some weak sisters into it.  Had it been just a less desirable, badly written stimulus, that would be one thing, but this is very clearly not stimulating AT ALL.  So the arrogance of the House Dems and the President, drunk on power, has put us here.<br />
Johnny Lunchpail will not look back in a year when things get better and say, yep, it was that great Obama stimulus.  If things aren&#8217;t better by March 1, the Folks will be pretty darn receptive to hearing what a bad plan this was.  I hope there&#8217;s a real outreach process now.<br />
I believe you need the cloture vote to end debate on the Senate side, whether there&#8217;s an active filibuster or an &#8220;invisible&#8221; one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkady</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1680</link>
		<dc:creator>arkady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-1680</guid>
		<description>Why do they need cloture Bill?  Isn&#039;t a 60 vote majority all that is required to get this abomination passed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do they need cloture Bill?  Isn&#8217;t a 60 vote majority all that is required to get this abomination passed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkady</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-27590</link>
		<dc:creator>arkady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27590</guid>
		<description>Why do they need cloture Bill?  Isn&#039;t a 60 vote majority all that is required to get this abomination passed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do they need cloture Bill?  Isn&#8217;t a 60 vote majority all that is required to get this abomination passed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Dupray</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Dupray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>A unanimously steel spine.  Very rare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A unanimously steel spine.  Very rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Dupray</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-27589</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Dupray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27589</guid>
		<description>A unanimously steel spine.  Very rare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A unanimously steel spine.  Very rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Martin</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>Bravo for the House Republicans on this one. 

Looks like they might have started listening to Rush Limbaugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo for the House Republicans on this one. </p>
<p>Looks like they might have started listening to Rush Limbaugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Martin</title>
		<link>http://libertypundits.net/article/every-republican-votes-no-on-obama-pork-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-27588</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertypundits.net/?p=2967#comment-27588</guid>
		<description>Bravo for the House Republicans on this one. 

Looks like they might have started listening to Rush Limbaugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo for the House Republicans on this one. </p>
<p>Looks like they might have started listening to Rush Limbaugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/35 queries in 0.141 seconds using disk

Served from: libertypundits.net @ 2010-09-11 02:58:38 -->